

JELLYJELLY's whitepaper presents a concerning lack of technical substance that raises red flags for serious investors. The document primarily positions the token as a "video chat content platform" without detailing the underlying technological architecture or innovative elements that would differentiate it from existing solutions. This absence of technical specificity is particularly problematic when examining its market positioning.
When comparing JELLYJELLY to other established projects, the technical shortcomings become evident:
| Aspect | JELLYJELLY | Industry Standard |
|---|---|---|
| Technical Documentation | Minimal details | Comprehensive architecture |
| Innovation Claims | Vague AI references | Specific technological breakthroughs |
| Use Case Definition | Limited to short video sharing | Multiple utility scenarios |
Despite being listed on INDODAX, Indonesia's largest cryptocurrency exchange with over 7.5 million users, JELLYJELLY's market presence appears to rely more on meme appeal and FOMO marketing than technological merit. The project claims association with the "original Venmo team" and leverages Silicon Valley connections, yet fails to articulate how its technology solves genuine problems or creates value beyond speculative trading. This technical deficiency explains why the token has experienced extreme price volatility, with values fluctuating between $0.003674 and $0.2451 within months of its launch.
JELLYJELLY experienced unprecedented market volatility in March 2025, with prices surging by 429% in a single hour during a short squeeze event on the Hyperliquid platform. This extraordinary price movement highlighted the extreme risk potential in low liquidity token contracts. Following this dramatic rise, the token experienced a sharp correction, demonstrating the unstable nature of such rapid gains.
Market data reveals the volatile journey of JELLYJELLY throughout 2025:
| Time Period | Price Action | Market Reaction |
|---|---|---|
| March 2025 | 429% surge in 1 hour | Short squeeze triggered market frenzy |
| March-August | Sharp decline to $0.017 | 93% drop from peak price of $0.245 |
| September-October | Recovery to $0.156 | Speculative trading resumed |
| November 2025 | Decline to $0.062 | Market stabilization attempts |
By August 2025, JELLYJELLY's market remained highly susceptible to corrections, with its 30-day performance showing a 41.02% decline. The token's extreme price swings reflect broader speculative trends in the cryptocurrency market, where assets can experience dramatic value fluctuations within very short timeframes. The volatility data from JELLYJELLY serves as a case study for understanding market risk, particularly in low-liquidity environments where rapid price movements can occur with relatively small trading volumes.
JellyJelly experienced a dramatic market capitalization collapse in 2025, revealing severe liquidity problems that shocked investors. The token's market value plummeted precipitously as trading volumes became increasingly constrained, creating a downward spiral effect on price performance.
| Period | Market Cap | Price Impact | Trading Volume |
|---|---|---|---|
| Early 2025 | $250 million | $0.2451 (ATH) | Strong |
| Mid-2025 | ~$62 million | $0.06212 | Diminished |
| Late 2025 | $10 million | Near ATL | Critical shortage |
This 96% decline in market capitalization occurred despite JellyJelly's promising video-sharing technology platform. Financial data indicates the crisis began in August 2025 when trading volumes became erratic, followed by extreme price volatility in September and October. The market reached peak fear in November with the volatility index registering 42, firmly in "Fear" territory.
The liquidity crisis created a self-reinforcing cycle where declining prices triggered more sell orders, but with insufficient buyers to absorb the selling pressure. gate users reported increasing difficulty executing larger trades without significant slippage. JellyJelly's circulating supply remained at 999,999,099.34 tokens, but the diminishing liquidity effectively trapped many investors who couldn't exit positions without accepting substantial losses, further exacerbating the downward pressure on the token's value.
JELLYJELLY presents a mixed short-term outlook for Q4 2025, combining recent bullish momentum with heightened volatility indicators. The token experienced dramatic price swings in October 2025, rising from $0.05 to $0.16 before settling at $0.062 by November 3rd—still representing a 17.55% gain in 24 hours despite recent corrections.
Market sentiment remains divided, with technical indicators suggesting caution:
| Timeframe | Price Change | Market Signal |
|---|---|---|
| 24H | +17.55% | Bullish |
| 7D | -22.22% | Bearish |
| 30D | -41.02% | Bearish |
| VIX Score | 42 | Fear |
The token's volatility index reading of 42 indicates market fear, while sentiment analysis shows a narrow split of 51.92% positive versus 48.08% negative investor outlook. Short-term price prediction models suggest a bearish forecast for November 2025, with a projected price of $0.016859 by mid-month representing a potential 24.89% decrease.
Despite these warning signs, JELLYJELLY's underlying video sharing utility and substantial trading volume ($9.2M daily) provide reasons for cautious optimism. With a circulating supply of 999,999,099 tokens fully distributed and consistent exchange adoption across 18 platforms, the token maintains fundamental support even amidst technical volatility.
JELLYJELLY is a meme coin on Solana blockchain, linked to a video-sharing app for posting chat clips. It's a fun, community-driven token in the Web3 space.
Donald Trump's meme coin is $MAGA, an Ethereum token launched in January 2025. It combines meme culture with Trump's brand. The creator remains anonymous.
Reaching $1 is challenging for Jasmy, currently at $0.048. Market trends will heavily influence its future price movement.
Melania Trump's coin is called $MELANIA. It was launched as a meme coin in the crypto market.











